Posted by simonecusack on 22 May 2012 · Leave a Comment
In 1990, William Senych applied for housing without the knowledge of his common law partner, Cecilia Kell, an Aboriginal woman from the Rae-Edzo community in the Northwest Territories (N.W.T.) of Canada. Senych’s application was denied because he was not a member of the Rae-Edzo community for which the housing was earmarked. On the advice of … Read more
Filed under Canada, Cecilia Kell v Canada, CEDAW art 1, CEDAW art 14(2)(h), CEDAW art 15(4), CEDAW art 16(1)(h), CEDAW art 2(d), CEDAW art 2(e), Domestic and family violence, Effective remedy, Failure to exhaust domestic remedies, Failure to substantiate claim, General Recommendation No. 28, Indigenous women, Manifestly ill-founded, OP art 4(1), OP art 4(2)(c), OP art 4(2)(e), Property, Rural women, Violations predated Protocol · Tagged with Aboriginal women, Cecilia Kell v Canada, CEDAW art 1, CEDAW art 14(2)(h), CEDAW art 15(4), CEDAW art 16(1)(h), CEDAW art 2(d), CEDAW art 2(e), domestic violence, General Recommendation No. 28, intersectional discrimination, OP CEDAW art 4(1), OP CEDAW art 4(2)(c), OP CEDAW art 4(2)(e), Optional Protocol to CEDAW, property
Posted by simonecusack on 30 March 2012 · Leave a Comment
A.T., a Hungarian national, claimed that her former partner, L.F., subjected her to domestic violence over a period of more than four years. A.T. was issued ten medical certificates during this time connected to separate incidents of severe physical violence, including an incident on 27 July 2001, which resulted in her hospitalization. Despite reported … Read more
Filed under CEDAW art 16, CEDAW art 2(a), CEDAW art 2(b), CEDAW art 2(e), CEDAW art 5(a), Domestic and family violence, Due diligence, Effective remedy, Failure to exhaust domestic remedies, Gender stereotyping, General Recommendation No 19, Hungary, Interim measures, OP art 4(1), OP art 4(2)(e), OP art 5, Violations predated Protocol · Tagged with CEDAW art 16, CEDAW art 2(a), CEDAW art 2(b), CEDAW art 2(e), CEDAW art 5(a), domestic and family violence, due diligence, failure to exhaust domestic remedies, gender stereotyping, General Recommendation No. 19, Hungary, interim measures, OP CEDAW art 4(1), OP CEDAW art 4(2)(e), OP CEDAW art 5, ratione temporis
Posted by simonecusack on 15 March 2012 · Comments Off
The Lenin District Court of Belarus found Inga Abramova guilty of ‘minor hooliganism’ for hanging ribbons and posters calling for participation in the ‘European March.’ It subsequently ordered her to serve five days administrative arrest. Abramova claimed that, during her detention, a male staff member subjected her to a body search, touched her inappropriately, … Read more
Filed under Belarus, CEDAW 7(b), CEDAW art 1, CEDAW art 2(a), CEDAW art 2(b), CEDAW art 2(d), CEDAW art 2(e), CEDAW art 2(f), CEDAW art 3, CEDAW art 5(a), Cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, Detention, Failure to exhaust domestic remedies, Failure to substantiate claim, General Recommendation No 19, ICCPR, Inga Abramova v Belarus, OP art 4(1), OP art 4(2)(c), Privacy, Sexual harassment, Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, Torture and other cruel, UN Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners... · Tagged with Belarus, CEDAW art 1, CEDAW art 2(a), CEDAW art 2(b), CEDAW art 2(d), CEDAW art 2(e), CEDAW art 2(f), CEDAW art 3, CEDAW art 5(a), CEDAW art 7(b), Cruel, Detention, failure to exhaust domestic remedies, failure to substantiate claim, General Recommendation No. 19, ICCPR, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, OP CEDAW art 4(1), OP CEDAW art 4(2)(c), privacy, sexual harassment, torture
Posted by simonecusack on 7 March 2012 · Comments Off
V.K., a Bulgarian national, claimed that her husband, F.K., subjected her to varied forms of domestic violence. In 2006, V.K. moved to Poland with her husband and their children. In 2007, following continued abuse, V.K. filed an application for protective measures and financial maintenance with the Warsaw District Court, but the proceedings went unresolved. … Read more
Filed under Bulgaria, CEDAW art 1, CEDAW art 16, CEDAW art 2(a), CEDAW art 2(b), CEDAW art 2(c), CEDAW art 2(e), CEDAW art 2(f), CEDAW art 2(g), CEDAW art 5(a), Domestic and family violence, Due diligence, Extraterritoriality, Failure to substantiate claim, Fair trial, Gender stereotyping, General Recommendation No 19, Interim measures, OP art 4(2)(c), OP art 5, V.K. v. Bulgaria · Tagged with CEDAW art 1, CEDAW art 16, CEDAW art 2(a), CEDAW art 2(b), CEDAW art 2(c), CEDAW art 2(e), CEDAW art 2(f), CEDAW art 2(g), domestic and family violence, due diligence, extraterritoriality, failure to substantiate claim, fair trial, gender stereotyping, General Recommendation No. 19, interim measures, OP CEDAW art 4(2)(c), OP CEDAW art 5
